Skip to main content
Opens in a new tab External site
Pensions trustees fear private equity takeover
New research shows that whilst trustees will consider private equity as an investment option, the vast majority are concerned about a private equity takeover

LONDON, 5 February 2008 – Nearly three quarters of pension trustees (72 per cent) would be concerned if their scheme’s sponsoring employer were to be taken over by a private equity firm, according to new research released today by Aon Consulting, a leading pension, benefits and HR consulting firm.

 

Aon Consulting surveyed over 250 trustees of Defined Benefit (DB) schemes on how they felt about the prospect of a takeover by a private equity private equity firm, as well as whether they would consider PE as an investment opportunity.

 

Results showed that the prospect of being bought by a private equity firm raised fears with nearly three quarters (72 per cent) of trustees. This figure rose to almost 80 per cent of responses when the results were narrowed to trustees of schemes with a value in excess of £100million. 

 

The main reasons given for such concern related to short-term funding concerns (around 30 per cent), followed by worries about a deterioration in the strength of the covenant (around 20 per cent) and concerns about potential lack of interest in the scheme’s members (20 per cent).  Trustees were also concerned simply by a fear of the unknown (15 per cent).

 

However, in contrast to trustees’ wariness of private equity acquisition, their attitude shifts positively when it comes to investing in privately owned companies as a means of diversification. Around a fifth (21 per cent) of trustees said that they have considered and implemented, or are currently considering, investment in PE. For schemes with a value over £100 million, where almost a third (31 per cent) say they are considering, or have already invested in PE.

 

The significant influence of pension trustees in the outcome of takeovers by private equity has come to light in the past year as the PE industry has flourished. In high profile deals such as the buyout of Alliance-Boots and Delta’s recent failed bid for Sainsbury’s, the acquirer’s need to win the backing of trustees was perceived to be critical to the outcome.

 

The survey results indicate that if private equity firms are to bid successfully for companies with DB schemes of significant size, then one of the key battles for such firms will be the need to gain the backing of trustees. In order to do this they must demonstrate commitment towards pension schemes and understanding of trustee priorities.

 

Commenting on the survey results, Paul McGlone, principal and senior actuary at Aon Consulting said:

 

The survey shows that the private equity industry still has challenges to face to win the backing of trustees, who are not just concerned by its asset stripping reputation or fears over scheme funding, but also by the attitude to scheme members. Some trustees’ fears are very specific and well founded, such as the concern that gearing could move the scheme down the order of creditors.  However other concerns are simply a fear of the unknown.

 

“Recent large buyouts have raised the profile of trustees, who perform an essential role in protecting the interests of their scheme’s members, and would-be private equity acquirers must engage with trustees to allay their fears at an early stage.  However trustees must also recognise the potential benefits to the business that a new owner can bring, and must carefully assess the impact of any private equity acquisition on their sponsor and scheme on a case by case basis and decide how they might protect members’ interests in the event of takeover.”

 

Ends

For more information contact:

Susie Patterson / Leo Wood

0207 269 7233 / 137

susie.patterson@fd.com / leo.wood@fd.com

 

 

About the Aon Consulting Trustee Survey

250 trustees of the UK’s largest defined benefit pension schemes were surveyed between October and November 2007. Of trustees surveyed:

 

·         A total of 72 per cent answered ‘yes’ to the question ‘Would the prospect of being bought by a private equity company raise concerns with you?’

  • A total of 21 per cent said they ‘Have considered and implemented’ or are ‘Currently considering’ private equity as an investment option.

 

About Aon Consulting

Aon Corporation (NYSE:AOC) is the leading global provider of risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, human capital and management consulting, and specialty insurance underwriting. Through its 43,000 professionals worldwide, Aon readily delivers distinctive client value via innovative and effective risk management and workforce productivity solutions. Our industry-leading global resources, technical expertise and industry knowledge are delivered locally through more than 500 offices in more than 120 countries. Aon was ranked by A.M. Best as the number one global insurance brokerage in 2007 based on brokerage revenues, and voted best insurance intermediary, best reinsurance intermediary, and best employee benefits consulting firm in 2007 by the readers of Business Insurance. For more information on Aon, log onto www.aon.com.

 

About Aon

Aon Corporation (NYSE:AOC) is the leading global provider of risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, human capital and management consulting, and specialty insurance underwriting. Through its 43,000 professionals worldwide, Aon readily delivers distinctive client value via innovative and effective risk management and workforce productivity solutions. Our industry-leading global resources, technical expertise and industry knowledge are delivered locally through more than 500 offices in more than 120 countries. Aon was ranked by A.M. Best as the number one global insurance brokerage in 2007 based on brokerage revenues, and voted best insurance intermediary, best reinsurance intermediary, and best employee benefits consulting firm in 2007 by the readers of Business Insurance. For more information on Aon, log onto www.aon.com.

 

This press release contains certain statements related to future results, or states our intentions, beliefs and expectations or predictions for the future which are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from either historical or anticipated results depending on a variety of factors. Potential factors that could impact results include: general economic conditions in different countries in which we do business around the world, changes in global equity and fixed income markets that could affect the return on invested assets, fluctuations in exchange and interest rates that could influence revenue and expense, rating agency actions that could affect our ability to borrow funds, funding of our various pension plans, changes in the competitive environment, our ability to implement restructuring initiatives and other initiatives intended to yield cost savings, our ability to successfully execute strategic options for our Combined Insurance subsidiary, the impact of current, pending and future regulatory and legislative actions that affect our ability to market and sell, and be reimbursed at current levels for, our Sterling subsidiary’s Medicare Advantage health plans, changes in commercial property and casualty markets and commercial premium rates that could impact revenues, changes in revenues and earnings due to the elimination of contingent commissions, other uncertainties surrounding a new compensation model, the impact of investigations brought by state attorneys general, state insurance regulators, federal prosecutors, and federal regulators, the impact of class actions and individual lawsuits including client class actions, securities class actions, derivative actions, ERISA class actions, the impact of the analysis of practices relating to stock options, the cost of resolution of other contingent liabilities and loss contingencies, and the difference in ultimate paid claims in our underwriting companies from actuarial estimates.  Further information concerning the Company and its business, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s financial results, is contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Media Resources

Access international media contacts, the full library of Aon media releases, and a media kit with fact sheet and executive bios, via links below.

Media Contacts
Media Releases
Media Kit
Featured Updates