Loading

Aon Media Center

Aon survey questions ‘gilts plus’ valuation method
Over half of schemes consider the method to be unhelpful

LONDON (22 May 2017) – Aon Hewitt, the global talent, retirement and health solutions business of Aon plc (NYSE:AON), has said that in a survey of pensions professionals, over half said that the ‘gilts plus’ method of pension scheme valuation was ‘unhelpful in the current environment’. However, only 8% said that the method was actually ‘broken’.

The poll of over 800 pensions professionals was conducted around the UK during Aon Hewitt’s annual pension conference series. It followed a session which considered all the main alternatives and examined the pros and cons of each. The polling allowed delegates to select from one of four responses:

Question: Is the ‘gilts plus’ method still appropriate?
Yes, it is completely appropriate - liabilities are bond-like and
it's appropriate to use a bond-like way of valuing them                    27%

It still has a place, but it is not helpful in the current environment     56%

No, it is broken and shouldn't be used                                            8%

Don't know                                                                                   9%

The survey was conducted on the back of debate within the pension industry around valuation methods. This has largely been driven by falling gilt yields and hence rapidly increasing liability values. The responses highlight that, though the method has its challenges, it is far from being permanently broken in the eyes of the industry. Part of the reason for this is that most of the viable alternatives also show liability values going up by similar amounts.

Paul McGlone, ‎partner and scheme actuary at Aon Hewitt, said:
“The first concern about the ‘gilts plus’ method is that it places a value on the liabilities that is too high. But when you examine that closely it's not clear that the criticism stands up to scrutiny. If we accept that we are in a low yield and low return environment, then the amount of money needed to pay pensions goes up, and contributions need to do more of the work. Denying that and assuming that returns will be higher doesn't solve the problem – it just hides it.”

Since the start of 2010, yields have fallen by about 3%, increasing the value placed on a typical pension scheme's liabilities by around 50% compared with what they would otherwise have been. However, over the same period, expected returns on other asset classes have also fallen by similar amounts.

Paul McGlone continued:
"The second concern about the method is that it encourages investment in gilts and bonds at a time when they are expensive by historical standards. There is some truth in that; measuring funding by reference to gilts will result in gilt-like movements in liability values, which can then only be hedged by gilt-like investments.  But schemes should be investing and measuring based on their long-term objectives. If those long-term objectives are not to hold gilts then measuring progress with a strict ‘gilts plus’ method is not going to be helpful."

Jay Harvey, partner at Aon Hewitt, said:
“It may be that if the ‘gilts plus’ method is to remain in use, more can be made of its flexibility. One of the key flexibilities is the ability to vary the size of the ‘plus.’ Although scheme’s trustees and advisers become accustomed to the assumptions used, best practice is to review the size of the ‘plus’ at each valuation and, where justified, adjust it based on economic conditions. The Pensions Regulator also encourages schemes to do this. Although they like to see consistency in approach, they want schemes to take a robust and well-informed approach to valuations."

Jay Harvey continued:
"It is also worth stressing that the Pensions Regulator is not wedded to ‘gilts plus’ as a method, and the recent annual funding statement reiterates this position. If a scheme has no intention of using gilts in the long-term and therefore wants to use a method which generates discount rates through some other means, then there is nothing in legislation or regulatory practice to prevent that. As long as the approach is robust and well-informed, then there normally won't be a problem.”

Media Contact
For further information please contact:
Colin Mayes                                           Anelia Fikiina
Aon Hewitt                                             CNC
01372 733689                                         020 3219 8887
colin.mayes@aonhewitt.com                   anelia.fikiina@cnc-communications.com

About the ‘gilts plus’ valuation method
The ‘gilts plus’ valuation method is an approach to valuing pensions where each future pension payment is discounted based on the current gilt yield, or a margin above gilt yields.  As gilt yields have fallen, discount rates have also fallen and liabilities have increased.  Although the margin above gilt yields does not need to be fixed, in practice it often is, so changes in yield translate directly into changes in discount rate.  Each small reduction in discount rate results in a much larger (10-20 times) increase in liability because the discount rate applies over such a long period of time.

About the survey
The survey was conducted between February and May during series of Aon’s annual pension conference series.  All responses pre-date the issue of the Pension Regulator's annual funding statement.

About Aon
Aon plc (NYSE:AON) is a leading global professional services firm providing a broad range of risk, retirement and health solutions. Our 50,000 colleagues in 120 countries empower results for clients by using proprietary data and analytics to deliver insights that reduce volatility and improve performance.

 


 

 

 

 



If you elect to comment or engage with our content via third-party social media websites, you authorize Aon to have access to certain social media profile information. Please click here to learn more about information that may be collected when using these tools on Aon.com


email Email   print Print   rss