Skip to main content
Opens in a new tab External site

Newsroom

Despite Optimism That a Recovery is Coming, Cost-Cutting Plans Far From Over for U.S. Companies, Hewitt Survey Reveals

Hewitt Recommends Companies Look For the Right Mix of HR Cost Reduction Strategies That Can Save Money Yet Minimize the Long-Term Impact to Employees and the Business

Apr 23, 2009

Apr 23, 2009
7:43pm

LINCOLNSHIRE, Ill. — U.S. employers are optimistic that the economy will recover by early 2010, but most say they still need to take further actions to reduce costs through the end of this year, according to a new survey by Hewitt Associates, a global human resources consulting and outsourcing company. As many companies begin their next round of cuts, Hewitt believes employers should consider a combination of approaches to lower costs and protect their long-term business plans, while preserving the trust, morale, productivity and retention of their workforces.

Earlier this month, Hewitt conducted a survey of HR executives at 518 large U.S. employers, representing more than $4 trillion in annual revenue, to understand their current and future HR cost reduction efforts in light of the economy. The survey found that 54 percent believe the nation's economic upturn will begin at the end of this year or in early 2010, and most believe their own company's economic improvement will coincide with that upturn. However, 81 percent say they are considering further actions now to cut costs, even though they have already made significant reductions.

Companies say they consider employee engagement levels when deciding on HR cost-cutting efforts, yet nearly half (47 percent) of HR executives think employee trust has declined because of the way their companies have already managed cost reductions. Further, 37 percent feel the way they've managed the economic downturn will make top talent more likely to leave once the economy improves.

Hewitt's survey also found that many companies may only be considering cost-cutting strategies that have a significant impact on the majority of their workforces. For example, more than a quarter (28 percent) say they are contemplating organizational restructuring, and 25 percent are considering additional layoffs. Twenty-two percent may reduce or eliminate their employer 401(k) match.

Additionally, employers are also considering measures that may have a lower impact on workers such as offering early retirement packages (16 percent), alternative work arrangements (15 percent) or opportunities for job sharing and/or temporary assignments (10 percent).

Employers' Past & Future HR Cost Reduction Efforts
Undertaken Percent Being Considered Percent
Hiring/Restructuring    
Hiring freeze or hiring reductions 75% 17%
Layoffs (permanent reductions) 63% 25%
Organizational restructuring 50% 28%
Process or technology improvements 39% 21%
Reducing promotions 30% 11%
Voluntary separations 26% 17%
Outsourcing of some functions 19% 24%
Early retirement 11% 16%
Implementing job sharing and/or temp assignments 7% 10%
Pay    
Salary or wage freeze 58% 20%
Reducing or eliminating year-end bonuses 28% 23%
Salary or wage reductions 16% 21%
Hours    
Shorter workweek/involuntary furlough 20% 24%
Voluntary leave of absence and/or time off 11% 21%
Benefits    
Reducing/eliminating 401(k) employer match 20% 22%
Increasing employee healthcare cost-sharing 13% 32%
Freezing or closing pension plans 12% 13%
Reducing/eliminating subsidy for other benefits (e.g., vision, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) 9% 23%
Changes in Paid Time Off policy 9% 16%
Reducing employer subsidy for retiree medical 8% 11%
Reducing medical benefits 6% 19%
Other Programs    
Increasing travel restrictions 72% 13%
Decreasing employee training and/or development 40% 14%
Increasing alternative work arrangements (e.g., telecommuting) 14% 15%
None 6% 19%

"What makes this next wave of cost reductions even more difficult than the first is that the 'low hanging' fruit is already gone," said Joanne Dahm, practice leader of Hewitt's North American Talent and Organization Consulting business. "Companies around the world are looking for the right combination of HR cost-cutting actions that maximize savings while minimizing the negative effects on the workforce. While high-impact actions like layoffs and 401(k) match suspensions may be necessary, many other strategies can produce similar results and help preserve employee morale and engagement. There's no silver bullet answer — so the key is finding the right combination of trade-offs for each organization."

Hewitt's research on past economic downturns shows that companies can come out of a crisis even stronger if they make smart decisions about which investments to keep intact to protect their capabilities. Hewitt believes there are five key guidelines employers should consider as they develop a strategy for HR cost reductions:

  • Consider Alternatives Before Layoffs. Layoffs are one of the most common HR cost-cutting tactics during tough times, and they may be entirely necessary. However, workforce reductions have a significant impact on employee morale. Additionally, this step could end up costing the company if these skills are difficult to replace when the economy picks up.
  • Understand Employee Preferences. Before cutting HR programs or benefits, organizations should understand which are the most meaningful to workers. Companies may find they can cut programs that most employees didn't value in the first place, and save a significant amount of money without hurting morale.
  • Take Inventory of Global Programs. It's important for global companies to evaluate whether HR programs and benefits outside their home countries are overly generous relative to the rest of the market. Without taking a global view, employees at company headquarters are likely to shoulder a greater burden of the cost-cutting efforts.
  • Make Leaders Visible and Accessible. Senior leadership needs a set of consistent messages and a well thought out communication plan to explain the business realities and rationale for tough decisions — and leaders should communicate regularly in a variety of forums, both formal and informal.
  • Encourage Open Communication. Creating an ongoing dialogue with employees at all levels is more important now than ever. Managers should have regular and informal conversations with employees to stay attuned to their concerns and raise red flags to senior leaders. Regular channels — like the corporate Intranet, town hall meetings and company newsletters — are easy ways to keep employees informed, involved and engaged, especially as the company works through tough issues. One of the worst things managers can do is retreat behind closed doors, leading employees to fear the worst.

Click here to view/download a results summary for the Cost Reduction and Engagement Survey that this press release refers to.

About Hewitt Associates

Hewitt Associates (NYSE: HEW) provides leading organizations around the world with expert human resources consulting and outsourcing solutions to help them anticipate and solve their most complex benefits, talent, and related financial challenges. Hewitt consults with companies to design and implement a wide range of human resources, retirement, investment management, health management, compensation, and talent management strategies. As a leading outsourcing provider, Hewitt administers health care, retirement, payroll, and other HR programs to millions of employees, their families, and retirees. With a history of exceptional client service since 1940, Hewitt has offices in 33 countries and employs approximately 23,000 associates who are helping make the world a better place to work. For more information, please visit www.hewitt.com.

Media Contacts:

Catherine  Brandt

,  Hewitt Associates,  (847) 883-1000


MacKenzie Lucas

,  Hewitt Associates,  (847) 883-1000

Media Resources

Access international media contacts, the full library of Aon media releases, and a media kit with fact sheet and executive bios, via links below.

Media Contacts
Media Releases
Media Kit
Featured Updates